🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a fresh game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this mode mirrors the standard Breakthrough setup but features a few notable changes:

• Every squad includes just eight human participants, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Activities performed by real players award full XP, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, the playlist delivers on its name: it's a casual version of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it gives more options for gamers seeking alternative ways to enjoy the game. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Player Reactions: From Fury to Praise

"People want human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your rivals," states a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing concept," says another. Meanwhile, in community forums, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are going with this game," while another details all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants keep it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Let them strike a balance," adds another. One reply on Twitter explains that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," while another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Concerns and Player Input

All that said, players have valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it will make wait times more extended for different playlists because of the sheer number of options in the game already. Similarly, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to provide full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the system. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base compromising halfway, according to forum feedback. Another labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I had so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Be Made?

If the development team has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and acting on player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, if their data shows this new playlist is underperforming to their standards, they won't be shy to make further modifications.