🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my life is stored on the platform, and suddenly they expect us to fork out money for it."

One-star ratings and a sense of injustice have dominated online discussion since the messaging service emerged as the newest digital platform to put a price tag on a feature that individuals previously enjoyed using for free.

The app's parent company revealed in September that it would require payment from subscribers if they have more than five gigabytes of saved images and clips stored as Snapchat Memories.

For many, these past uploads act as a glimpse into earlier times – driving some to accuse the firm of "corporate greed" in posts on online platforms and negative ratings on Google and Apple's app stores.

Available Solutions

The company has likened its paid storage plans to those made available by tech giants for handsets.

And as an alternative for individuals avoiding fees, users have the ability to export their saved content – which for certain users cover significant data – to their personal gadget.

Snap mentioned that only a small number of members would be influenced by the changes.

It also acknowledged that it was "inherently difficult to move from accessing content at no charge to paying for it" – but suggested it would be "a valuable investment" for subscribers.

A significant number of denouncing the change online seem to disagree.

Public Outcry

A web-based protest called the charge a "archival levy", with users calling it "bleak" and "outrageous" – while a user promised to abandon the application in the future.

In parallel, in a poor evaluation on the Google Play store, a person named an online commenter said it felt "deeply unfair".

"As a member of that generation, the majority have years worth of personal moments on this service," they commented. "The vast majority only remained on the platform primarily for that reason. Five gigabytes is insufficient when you have a long timeline of moments... Goodbye to the app."

Furthermore, Guste Ven, a young adult media studies major in the UK capital, revealed on a social network her decision to delete the app.

"I made up my mind that I wanted to export all my saved content as soon as I could," she stated. "Almost all of my youth have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the pictures in there are extremely valuable to me."

"This seems illogical to demand payment individuals for something that has been complimentary for a considerable period."

Uncertain Costs

The platform has not yet said how much subscription tiers would be priced at in the Britain – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

Yet 23-year-old Amber Daley, who also lives in the capital, stated in a upload on the video service that she would be "upset" by these fees.

Amber noted that the app had become "a regular habit" since she started using it in the past.

Despite admitting she accepted the service needed to make money, the user indicated that the archival function means more to users than the company may have anticipated.

"I think it's a somewhat inequitable decision to demand payment from your subscribers who have been faithful and dedicated," she explained. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our genuine personal moments."

Expert Analysis

Companies deciding to charge from subscribers for a function that was once complimentary is nothing new, and numerous people cover the cost of services like digital backup services to backup their photos and videos from their smartphone.

The reality of archiving content in the online servers – which certain experts in the digital field often describe as simply "a remote system" – is that it requires funding.

"Hosting enormous quantities of archived media on the platform isn't a trivial amount," digital strategist Matt Navarra explained. "Snapchat has to try to find a way to offset the expenses of archiving, data transfer, back-ups, media distribution, encryption – everything involved."

Yet the consultant indicated that requiring payment for a feature that had earlier required no payment, and subscribers had been encouraged to use as such, may seem like a "misleading tactic" for certain individuals.

"Moving the goalposts after users have accumulated this extensive stored content feels inappropriate," he explained. And for many, he stated, "Memories aren't just data dumps, they're sentimental records."

The sentiment was shared by those leaving negative feedback, with a user calling their Snapchat photos and videos "extremely valuable to me".

"[Memories] have each part of my experiences within them from celebrations of new family members' births, grieving for lost relatives, memories with friends/family, [and] my entire youth," they expressed.

Expert Analysis

Dr Taylor Annabell, a postdoctoral researcher at a Dutch institution in the Holland, said that Snapchat's move shows the consequences of commercial platforms being used to save emotional private media.

"They benefit from this reliance, connected relationship, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even motivates some users to stay on the service or keep accessing it in order to revisit their stored media," she informed the BBC. "Yet these are not benevolent guardians of personal memory."